State v. Roberts

616 So. 2d 50, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 612, 1993 WL 102302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 661 So. 2d 821
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 8, 1993·No. No. 80836·Published

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Roberts v. State, 606 So.2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Roberts and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roberts, 616 So. 2d 50, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 612, 1993 WL 102302 (Fla. 1993).

616 So. 2d 50 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rucker
613 So. 2d 460 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Roberts v. State
606 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)