State v. Robert Jarnagin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

State v. Robert Jarnagin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided May 12, 2000·No. E1998-00892-CCA-R8-CD·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT JARNAGIN

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamblen County No. 97-CR-181 James E. Beckner, Judge

No. E1998-00892-CCA-R8-CD - Decided May 12, 2000

JUDGE TIPTON concurring.

I concur in the results reached and with most of the reasoning used in the majority opinion. I only note that the parties tried this case with an understanding that the Sensing requirements applied to the Intoximeter EC-IR. However, no evidence in the record shows such to be the case. Absent such evidence, I would not conclude in this case that Sensing applies in all cases involving the Intoximeter EC-IR. That should be left to another day with a more developed record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT JARNAGIN

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamblen County No. 97-CR-181 James E. Beckner, Judge

No. E1998-00892-CCA-R8-CD - Decided May 12, 2000

JUDGE TIPTON concurring.

I concur in the results reached and with most of the reasoning used in the majority opinion. I only note that the parties tried this case with an understanding that the Sensing requirements applied to the Intoximeter EC-IR. However, no evidence in the record shows such to be the case. Absent such evidence, I would not conclude in this case that Sensing applies in all cases involving the Intoximeter EC-IR. That should be left to another day with a more developed record.

State v. Robert Jarnagin, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

State v. Robert Jarnagin (State v. Robert Jarnagin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.