State v. Robert Glen Coe
This text of State v. Robert Glen Coe (State v. Robert Glen Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON
ROBERT GLEN COE, ) C.C.A. No. 02C01-9606-CR-00200 ) Appellant, ) SHELBY COUNTY ) VS ) ) FILED STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) April 2, 1997 Appellee. ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk ORDER DENYING PETITION TO REHEAR
Petitioner has filed a petition to rehear. He alleges the Court did not address
the exceptions to the statute of limitations with regard to Issues 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
and 14.
Firstly, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed pursuant to Rule 20,
Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals; therefore, there was not an in-depth analysis
of the various issues.
Furthermore, the Court concluded that Issues 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 were
either waived, previously determined on direct appeal and/or time-barred. Our further
examination of each of these issues does not indicate that any of them fall within any
of the exceptions under Burford v. State, 845 S.W.2d 204 (Tenn. 1992).
As to Issue 14 our Court determined the issue had been waived and is time-
barred. Likewise, we find nothing to indicate that this issue comes within any
exception to the statute of limitations under Burford.
The petition is respectfully DENIED. So ordered.
JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Robert Glen Coe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robert-glen-coe-tenncrimapp-2010.