State v. Roberson

30 So. 3d 286, 2010 WL 1192563
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 4, 2010
Docket45,448-KA
StatusPublished

This text of 30 So. 3d 286 (State v. Roberson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Roberson, 30 So. 3d 286, 2010 WL 1192563 (La. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA, Appellee,
v.
GRALEY ROBERSON, Appellant.

No. 45,448-KA.

Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

March 4, 2010.
Not Designated for Publication.

BRUCE G. WHITTAKER, Louisiana Appellate Project, Counsel for Appellant.

CHARLES R. SCOTT District Attorney, JASON BROWN, Assistant District Attorney, Counsel for Appellee.

Before STEWART, DREW and MOORE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from the First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, the Honorable John R. Joyce, judge pro-tempore presiding, and directed to the attention of the Honorable Craig Marcotte, judge presiding. This Court's error patent review reveals that the trial court has failed to resentence the defendant before granting his motion to appeal. This matter, therefore, is assigned for summary disposition, without oral argument, under the authority of U.R.C.A. Rule 2-11.3.

The defendant previously appealed his conviction and sentence for Possession of 400 grams or more of cocaine in violation of La. R.S. 40:967(F)(1)(c). Because the trial court did not rule on a timely filed motion for new trial, this court issued a per curiam opinion rendered on January 8, 2009, vacating the defendant's sentence and remanding the matter back to the trial court for further proceedings while reserving the defendant's right to appeal the trial court's ruling.

The minutes filed with the record reveal that the motion for new trial was withdrawn on September 10, 2009. The minutes show that on October 9, 2009, a motion for appeal and designation of the record was filed and was granted by the trial court on October 13, 2009. Nothing indicates that the defendant was re-sentenced. An appeal from a conviction before sentencing is premature. La. C. Cr. P. art. 912(C); State v. Carrerot, 63 So. 599 (La. 1913).

Therefore, the matter is remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing. The appellant's right to appeal any adverse rulings or sentence subsequently imposed is hereby reserved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carrerot
63 So. 599 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 So. 3d 286, 2010 WL 1192563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberson-lactapp-2010.