State v. Robbins

Utah Supreme Court

State v. Robbins

733 P.2d 132, 51 Utah Adv. Rep. 12, 1987 Utah LEXIS 645

Utah Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1987·No. No. 860201·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion to “correct sentencing error” which he brought before the trial court, pro se. The ruling is affirmed. This Court has previ[133]*133ously considered defendant’s contention that he is entitled to a reduction of sentence due to a legislative change in the governing statute and determined that the change does not apply in defendant’s case. Robbins v. Cook, 734 P.2d 415, 45 Utah Adv.Rep. 12 (1986).

The other issues raised in defendant’s brief were never presented to the trial court, and we decline to consider them for the first time on appeal. State v. Steggell, 660 P.2d 252 (Utah 1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion to “correct sentencing error” which he brought before the trial court, pro se. The ruling is affirmed. This Court has previ[133]*133ously considered defendant’s contention that he is entitled to a reduction of sentence due to a legislative change in the governing statute and determined that the change does not apply in defendant’s case. Robbins v. Cook, 734 P.2d 415, 45 Utah Adv.Rep. 12 (1986).

The other issues raised in defendant’s brief were never presented to the trial court, and we decline to consider them for the first time on appeal. State v. Steggell, 660 P.2d 252 (Utah 1983).

Affirmed.

State v. Robbins, 733 P.2d 132, 51 Utah Adv. Rep. 12, 1987 Utah LEXIS 645 (Utah 1987).

Pincite

733 P.2d 132 (State v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related