State v. . Robbins

78 N.C. 431
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1878·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Faircloth, J.

After hearing and considering the conflicting evidence, the. jury by their verdict have said the defendants "were guilty. No error in the conduct of the action has been pointed out to us, and we are unable to discover any in the record. Let this be certified in order that judgment may be pronounced.

No error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Robbins, 78 N.C. 431 (N.C. 1878).

78 N.C. 431 (State v. . Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Watson
214 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. . Robinson
195 S.E. 824 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
State v. . Lancaster
84 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Saunders v. . Gilbert
72 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
State v. . Davis
80 N.C. 351 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)
State v. . Bryson
60 N.C. 476 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1864)
State v. . Manuel
20 N.C. 144 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1838)