State v. Robbins

1999 MT 297A
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1999
Docket96-562
StatusPublished

This text of 1999 MT 297A (State v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Robbins, 1999 MT 297A (Mo. 1999).

Opinion

No

No. 96-562

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

1998 MT 297A

________________

STATE OF MONTANA, )

)

Plaintiff and Respondent, )

v. ) O R D E R

ROBERT ROBBINS, )

Defendant and Appellant. )

_______________

On December 8, 1998, the Opinion of this Court in the above-entitled cause was filed. State v. Robbins, 1998 MT 297. On December 18, 1998, appellant filed his Petition for Rehearing. On December 31, 1998, respondent filed a Response to the Petition for

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-562%20Order.htm (1 of 3)4/9/2007 4:17:31 PM No

Rehearing.

After review of this Court's Opinion issued December 8, 1998, and having considered the Petition for Rehearing as and the Response,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The last sentence in ¶ 43 of this Court's December 8, 1998 Opinion, State v. Robbins, 1998 MT 297 (Slip Op. at p. 20) is hereby deleted. Paragraph 43 will now read as follows:

*******************************

¶43 The severity of Weaver's injuries belie any finding of negligent homicide. We agree with the District Court's comment at sentencing that the evidence in this case clearly supported the deliberate homicide conviction. While the District Court should have issued a corrective, "failure to agree" jury instruction in this case, we conclude that its failure to do so was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and did not impermissibly taint the jury's verdict. State v. Wereman (1995), 273 Mont. 245, 251-52, 902 P.2d 1009, 1013; see also State v. Rothacher (1995), 272 Mont. 303, 310-12, 901 P.2d 82, 87-88.

2. In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED. Let remittitur issue forthwith.

3. The Clerk is directed to mail true copies of this order to counsel of record for the respective parties.

DATED this 21st day of January, 1999.

/S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER

/S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART

/S/ WILLIAM E. HUNT, SR.

/S/ JAMES C. NELSON

/S/ KARLA M. GRAY

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-562%20Order.htm (2 of 3)4/9/2007 4:17:31 PM No

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-562%20Order.htm (3 of 3)4/9/2007 4:17:31 PM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wereman
902 P.2d 1009 (Montana Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Rothacher
901 P.2d 82 (Montana Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Robbins
1998 MT 297 (Montana Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1999 MT 297A, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robbins-mont-1999.