State v. . Rivers

30 S.E.2d 322, 224 N.C. 419, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 2, 1944·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The record discloses that on 15 May, 1943, the defendant shot and killed his father-in-law at the defendant’s home near Burlington, Alamance County, while the two were quarreling over some trivial domestic matters. The defendant admitted firing the shot which killed the deceased, but he says he shot to repel an assault without any felonious intent. The’ issue was for the jury under the evidence disclosed by the record, and they have found an unlawful killing or manslaughter. The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled. G. S., 15-173 (formerly C. S., 4643); S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637, 113 S. E., 617; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682, 153 S. E., 155.

The remaining' exceptions are to portions of the charge. No authority is cited in support of the defendant’s position, and we have found no error in the trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Rivers, 30 S.E.2d 322, 224 N.C. 419, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 376 (N.C. 1944).

30 S.E.2d 322 (State v. . Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Artis
64 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. . Brooks
44 S.E.2d 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
State v. . Vaden
36 S.E.2d 913 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)