State v. . Rivers

30 S.E.2d 322, 224 N.C. 419, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 376
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 2, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 S.E.2d 322 (State v. . Rivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Rivers, 30 S.E.2d 322, 224 N.C. 419, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 376 (N.C. 1944).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The record discloses that on 15 May, 1943, the defendant shot and killed his father-in-law at the defendant’s home near Burlington, Alamance County, while the two were quarreling over some trivial domestic matters. The defendant admitted firing the shot which killed the deceased, but he says he shot to repel an assault without any felonious intent. The’ issue was for the jury under the evidence disclosed by the record, and they have found an unlawful killing or manslaughter. The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled. G. S., 15-173 (formerly C. S., 4643); S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637, 113 S. E., 617; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682, 153 S. E., 155.

The remaining' exceptions are to portions of the charge. No authority is cited in support of the defendant’s position, and we have found no error in the trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Artis
64 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. . Brooks
44 S.E.2d 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
State v. . Vaden
36 S.E.2d 913 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.E.2d 322, 224 N.C. 419, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rivers-nc-1944.