State v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Rivers

192 So. 533, 193 La. 927, 1939 La. LEXIS 1241

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 27, 1939·No. No. 35513.·Published

Opinion

FOURNET, Justice.

The defendants, after having been sentenced to the penitentiary on their pleas of guilty to a charge of grand larceny, filed motions (1) to set aside their sentence and to withdraw their plea of guilty, and (2) for a new trial. Both motions were overruled, to which rulings the defendants did not reserve bills of exception. There being no bills of exception to be reviewed by us and no error patent on the face of the record, the judgment therefore must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOURNET, Justice.

The defendants, after having been sentenced to the penitentiary on their pleas of guilty to a charge of grand larceny, filed motions (1) to set aside their sentence and to withdraw their plea of guilty, and (2) for a new trial. Both motions were overruled, to which rulings the defendants did not reserve bills of exception. There being no bills of exception to be reviewed by us and no error patent on the face of the record, the judgment therefore must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

State v. Rivers, 192 So. 533, 193 La. 927, 1939 La. LEXIS 1241 (La. 1939).

Pincite

192 So. 533 (State v. Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.