State v. Rivera, Unpublished Decision (5-18-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Rivera, Unpublished Decision (5-18-2006)

2006 Ohio 2460, 2006 WL 1351660

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 18, 2006

DocketNo. 86691.

StatusUnpublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2006 Ohio 2460 (State v. Rivera, Unpublished Decision (5-18-2006)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rivera, Unpublished Decision (5-18-2006), 2006 Ohio 2460, 2006 WL 1351660 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Luis Rivera ("Rivera"), appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 2004, Rivera was charged with one count of possession of drugs, two counts of drug trafficking, and one count of possession of criminal tools. Rivera filed a motion to suppress and, after a hearing, the court denied his motion. Rivera pled no contest to all charges and was found guilty by the court. He was sentenced to two years in prison.

{¶ 3} The following evidence was presented at the motion to suppress hearing. In September 2004, Detective Norman of the Cleveland Police Department was conducting surveillance at 3448 West 59th Street due to numerous complaints of heroin sales. He observed a Nissan pull int

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Luis Rivera ("Rivera"), appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 2004, Rivera was charged with one count of possession of drugs, two counts of drug trafficking, and one count of possession of criminal tools. Rivera filed a motion to suppress and, after a hearing, the court denied his motion. Rivera pled no contest to all charges and was found guilty by the court. He was sentenced to two years in prison.

{¶ 3} The following evidence was presented at the motion to suppress hearing. In September 2004, Detective Norman of the Cleveland Police Department was conducting surveillance at 3448 West 59th Street due to numerous complaints of heroin sales. He observed a Nissan pull int

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2006 Ohio 2460, 2006 WL 1351660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rivera-unpublished-decision-5-18-2006-ohioctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack