State v. Rivera-Rieffel
This text of 2021 ND 9 (State v. Rivera-Rieffel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT JANUARY 12, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 9
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jose Javier Rivera-Rieffel, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200210
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Rivera-Rieffel No. 20200210
[¶1] Jose Javier Rivera-Rieffel appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of murder and child abuse. He argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 9, 953 N.W.2d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rivera-rieffel-nd-2021.