State v. Rivera

818 A.2d 1284, 175 N.J. 612, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 336
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 8, 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Weissbard’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 351 N.J.Super. 93, 797 A.2d 175 (2002).

*613 For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI — 6.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rivera, 818 A.2d 1284, 175 N.J. 612, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 336 (N.J. 2003).

818 A.2d 1284 (State v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Ja
897 A.2d 1119 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
State v. Dalziel
867 A.2d 1167 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)