State v. Ritchie

69 Iowa 123
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted for the larceny of a heifer, the value of which was found by the jury to be thirty dollars, and was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for two years. He now appeals to this court. The case has been submitted to us without assignments of error, arguments, or appearance for the defendant. As required by the statute, we have given the case due consideration, and have carefully examined the whole record. We have been unable to find any error in the proceedings. We conclude, therefore, that the defendant was rightly convicted. The evidence sufficiently supports the verdict. The punishment awarded defendant is not excessive. We are not required to imagine grounds of errors, and go over the case, discussing objections which, in our opinion, might be made.

The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ritchie, 69 Iowa 123 (iowa 1886).

69 Iowa 123 (State v. Ritchie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Olander
193 Iowa 1379 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)