State v. Ringer

858 S.W.2d 877, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1329, 1993 WL 320987
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 24, 1993
DocketNos. WD 45662, WD 47451
StatusPublished

This text of 858 S.W.2d 877 (State v. Ringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ringer, 858 S.W.2d 877, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1329, 1993 WL 320987 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from his conviction of receiving stolen property. The direct appeal has been consolidated with his appeal [878]*878from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.15(1).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The appeal from denial of post-conviction relief is dismissed, as defendant failed to raise any issues regarding that proceeding. State v. Barnard, 820 S.W.2d 674, 677 (Mo.App.1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barnard
820 S.W.2d 674 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
858 S.W.2d 877, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1329, 1993 WL 320987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ringer-moctapp-1993.