State v. Riney
51 So. 89, 125 La. 121, 1910 La. LEXIS 459
Opinion
The defendant and appellant was convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses, and- was sentenced to hard labor for two years in the state penitentiary.
The record contains no bill of exception, and the motion for a new trial per se presents no question of law that this court can review. Harr’s Crim. Jurisprudence of La. 826-829. •
The sentence is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Riney, 51 So. 89, 125 La. 121, 1910 La. LEXIS 459 (La. 1910).
51 So. 89 (State v. Riney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Neville v. Overby
209 N.W. 552 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Smith
106 So. 298 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
State v. Munlin
62 So. 351 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)