State v. Rinda

2018 Ohio 2148
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 2018
Docket2018-T-0034
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 Ohio 2148 (State v. Rinda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rinda, 2018 Ohio 2148 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Rinda, 2018-Ohio-2148.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2018-T-0034 -vs- :

CHRISTOPHER J. RINDA, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeal from the Trumbull County Central District Court, Case No. 2018 CRB 0025.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481-1092 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Christopher J. Rinda, pro se, Inmate Id# 052387, Trumbull County Adult Justice Center, 150 High Street N.W., Warren, OH 44481 (Defendant-Appellant).

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J.

{¶1} Appellant filed a pro se “Motion for Appeal” on April 18, 2018. No

judgment entry was attached. However, it appears that he is appealing a February 14,

2018 entry of the Trumbull County Central District Court. A timely notice of appeal from

that entry was due no later than March 16, 2018, which was not a holiday or a weekend.

Thus, his appeal was untimely filed by approximately one month.

{¶2} App.R. 4(A)(1) states in relevant part: {¶3} “* * * [a] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its

entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.”

{¶4} Appellant has a remedy to file an untimely appeal from a criminal

judgment under App.R. 5(A), which states in relevant part:

{¶5} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶6} “(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶7} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶8} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶9} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of

right. * * *.”

{¶10} Further, appellant has not complied with Loc.R. 3(D)(2) of this court by

attaching a copy of the judgment being appealed to his notice of appeal.

{¶11} In the present case, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule

set forth in App.R. 4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this

court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Appellant has a remedy to file an

untimely appeal from a criminal judgment under App.R. 5(A).

{¶12} Based on the foregoing, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed as

being untimely.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J., TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 Ohio 2148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rinda-ohioctapp-2018.