State v. Riley
This text of 248 P.3d 83 (State v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Donald Eugene RILEY, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justice C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered at its November 2, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State v. Afana, 169 Wash.2d 169, 233 P.3d 879 (2010).
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 P.3d 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-riley-wash-2010.