State v. Riley
This text of State v. Riley (State v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed: October 25, 2001
STATE OF OREGON,
Respondent on Review,
v.
WENDY LOUISE RILEY,
Petitioner on Review.
On petition for review filed April 29, 1999.*
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was David E. Groom, State Public Defender.
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs, and De Muniz, Justices.**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of State v. Fugate, 332 Or 195, 26 P3d 802 (2001).
*On appeal from Deschutes County Circuit Court, Alta J. Brady, Judge. 158 Or App 649, 976 P2d 79 (1999).
**Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the decision of this case. Justice Thomas A. Balmer did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Riley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-riley-or-2001.