State v. Rigual

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Rigual

719 A.2d 1171, 247 Conn. 924, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 407

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 22, 1998

DocketSC 16026

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 A.2d 1171 (State v. Rigual) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rigual, 719 A.2d 1171, 247 Conn. 924, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 407 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 420 (AC 16019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had not improperly denied the defendant’s request to provide a race-neutral explanation for its peremptory challenge of a venireperson of Portuguese descent?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 420 (AC 16019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had not improperly denied the defendant’s request to provide a race-neutral explanation for its peremptory challenge of a venireperson of Portuguese descent?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 A.2d 1171, 247 Conn. 924, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rigual-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack