Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Riemer

State v. Riemer

763 N.E.2d 1183, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 531
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 4, 2002
Docket01-2107
StatusPublished

This text of 763 N.E.2d 1183 (State v. Riemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Riemer, 763 N.E.2d 1183, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 531 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 78952. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur. Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur but would also allow all other propositions of law. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 N.E.2d 1183, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-riemer-ohio-2002.