State v. Riely

4 S.C.L. 444
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 15, 1810·Published

Opinion

The Court,

Gp-niKK, Watuss, Lay, and Harvard,

refused a new trial, being of opinion it would bo contrary to the humanity of the law, and mislu be productive of consequences dangerous to the rights of individuals. That it would he grievously oppressive, to grant new trials iu cases of acquittaf, in criminal cases.

Motion rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Riely, 4 S.C.L. 444 (S.C. 1810).

4 S.C.L. 444 (State v. Riely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.