State v. Ridenbaugh

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Ridenbaugh

719 N.E.2d 969, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3706

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 24, 1999

Docket99-1278

StatusPublished

This text of 719 N.E.2d 969 (State v. Ridenbaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ridenbaugh, 719 N.E.2d 969, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3706 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Licking App. Nos. 97CA149, 97CA150, 97CA153 and 97CA154. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 1405, 716 N.E.2d 1167. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., would grant. Cook, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. II and V and would hold the cause on Propositions of Law Nos. Ill and V for the decision in 99-765, State v. Sutfecool, Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. Lundberg Stratton, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. IV and V.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Licking App. Nos. 97CA149, 97CA150, 97CA153 and 97CA154. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 1405, 716 N.E.2d 1167. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., would grant. Cook, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. II and V and would hold the cause on Propositions of Law Nos. Ill and V for the decision in 99-765, State v. Sutfecool, Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. Lundberg Stratton, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. IV and V.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 N.E.2d 969, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ridenbaugh-ohio-1999.