State v. Riddle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Riddle

282 S.E.2d 863, 277 S.C. 110, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 499

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 5, 1981

Docket21579

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 S.E.2d 863 (State v. Riddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Riddle, 282 S.E.2d 863, 277 S.C. 110, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 499 (S.C. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant’s probation was revoked following a hearing. He appeals from that revocation.

Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has filed a pro se brief with this Court.

The revocation hearing was so summary that the record is insufficient for our review.

We therefore reverse the probation revocation and remand the case for a hearing consistent with the guidelines set forth in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U. S. 778, 93 S. Ct. 1756, 36 L. Ed. (2d) 656 (1973) and Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471, 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. (2d) 484 (1972). Counsel’s petition to be relieved is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI