State v. Riddle

282 S.E.2d 863, 277 S.C. 110, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 499
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 5, 1981·No. 21579·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant’s probation was revoked following a hearing. He appeals from that revocation.

Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has filed a pro se brief with this Court.

The revocation hearing was so summary that the record is insufficient for our review.

We therefore reverse the probation revocation and remand the case for a hearing consistent with the guidelines set forth in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U. S. 778, 93 S. Ct. 1756, 36 L. Ed. (2d) 656 (1973) and Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471, 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. (2d) 484 (1972). Counsel’s petition to be relieved is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Riddle, 282 S.E.2d 863, 277 S.C. 110, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 499 (S.C. 1981).

282 S.E.2d 863 (State v. Riddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Allen
634 S.E.2d 653 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)