State v. Riddick
This text of 247 S.E.2d 234 (State v. Riddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Herman Leroy RIDDICK, Jr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Inasmuch as defendant did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, see State v. Riddick, 291 N.C. 399, 230 S.E.2d 506 (1976), he has waived his right now to complain about such errors. Hankerson v. North Carolina, 423 U.S. 233, 97 S.Ct. 2339, 53 L.Ed.2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant's motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 S.E.2d 234, 293 N.C. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-riddick-nc-1977.