State v. Riddick

247 S.E.2d 234, 293 N.C. 261
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 12, 1977·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

247 S.E.2d 234 (1977)
293 N.C. 261

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Herman Leroy RIDDICK, Jr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 12, 1977.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Inasmuch as defendant did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, see State v. Riddick, 291 N.C. 399, 230 S.E.2d 506 (1976), he has waived his right now to complain about such errors. Hankerson v. North Carolina, 423 U.S. 233, 97 S.Ct. 2339, 53 L.Ed.2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant's motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Riddick, 247 S.E.2d 234, 293 N.C. 261 (N.C. 1977).

247 S.E.2d 234 (State v. Riddick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Locklear
251 S.E.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Watson
246 S.E.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Abernathy
244 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)