State v. Richter
122 A.2d 502, 21 N.J. 421, 1956 N.J. LEXIS 248
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in the court below.
For affirmance—Ohief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Jacobs and Brennan—6.
For reversal—Fone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Richter, 122 A.2d 502, 21 N.J. 421, 1956 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1956).
122 A.2d 502 (State v. Richter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Wilson
762 A.2d 647 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)
State v. Carter
426 A.2d 501 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
In re Thompson
191 F. Supp. 545 (D. New Jersey, 1961)
State v. Johnson
163 A.2d 593 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
State v. Ciniglio
154 A.2d 845 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Hodgson v. Applegate
149 A.2d 839 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Fisch v. Manger
130 A.2d 815 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)