State v. Richie

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Richie

108 P. 134, 56 Or. 169, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 152

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 1910·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

. The defendants, Dollie Richie, Rose Leland, and Julia Downing, were separately indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of keeping and setting up, for the purposes of prostitution, fornication, and lewdness, houses of ill fame, to the possession of which, it is alleged, the defendants were severally entitled, and each appeals from the sentence pronounced against her.

These causes were by stipulation of the parties, tried in this court upon the same brief as in the case of State v. McGinnis, 56 Or. 162 (108 Pac. 132). As these causes involve the same legal principles as stated in the opinion in the case mentioned, the conclusion there reached is decisive herein; and hence each judgment referred to is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

. The defendants, Dollie Richie, Rose Leland, and Julia Downing, were separately indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of keeping and setting up, for the purposes of prostitution, fornication, and lewdness, houses of ill fame, to the possession of which, it is alleged, the defendants were severally entitled, and each appeals from the sentence pronounced against her.

These causes were by stipulation of the parties, tried in this court upon the same brief as in the case of State v. McGinnis, 56 Or. 162 (108 Pac. 132). As these causes involve the same legal principles as stated in the opinion in the case mentioned, the conclusion there reached is decisive herein; and hence each judgment referred to is affirmed. Affirmed.

State v. Richie, 108 P. 134, 56 Or. 169, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 152 (Or. 1910).

Pincite

108 P. 134 (State v. Richie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related