State v. Richie

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Richie

108 P. 134, 56 Or. 169, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 152

DecidedApril 12, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 108 P. 134 (State v. Richie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Richie, 108 P. 134, 56 Or. 169, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 152 (Or. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

. The defendants, Dollie Richie, Rose Leland, and Julia Downing, were separately indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of keeping and setting up, for the purposes of prostitution, fornication, and lewdness, houses of ill fame, to the possession of which, it is alleged, the defendants were severally entitled, and each appeals from the sentence pronounced against her.

These causes were by stipulation of the parties, tried in this court upon the same brief as in the case of State v. McGinnis, 56 Or. 162 (108 Pac. 132). As these causes involve the same legal principles as stated in the opinion in the case mentioned, the conclusion there reached is decisive herein; and hence each judgment referred to is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

. The defendants, Dollie Richie, Rose Leland, and Julia Downing, were separately indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of keeping and setting up, for the purposes of prostitution, fornication, and lewdness, houses of ill fame, to the possession of which, it is alleged, the defendants were severally entitled, and each appeals from the sentence pronounced against her.

These causes were by stipulation of the parties, tried in this court upon the same brief as in the case of State v. McGinnis, 56 Or. 162 (108 Pac. 132). As these causes involve the same legal principles as stated in the opinion in the case mentioned, the conclusion there reached is decisive herein; and hence each judgment referred to is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 P. 134, 56 Or. 169, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-richie-or-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack