State v. Richey
This text of 691 N.E.2d 1058 (State v. Richey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Putnam App. No. 12-87-2. On May 20,1996, this court stayed the execution of sentence, in this cause pending exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies. It appearing to the court that all matters have been disposed of in case No. 90-338, appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction; case No. 95-374, appellant’s appeal from his application for reopening in the court of appeals; and case No. 97-2728, appellant’s post-conviction appeal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay of execution entered in this cause on May 20,1996, be and is hereby revoked.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden, on Tuesday, the 30th day of June, 1998, in accordance with the statutes so provided.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Putnam County.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 N.E.2d 1058, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1498, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-richey-ohio-1998.