State v. Richardson

600 So. 2d 653, 1992 La. LEXIS 2392, 1992 WL 155600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 578 So. 2d 131
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 26, 1992·No. No. 92-K-1132·Published

Opinion

In re Richardson, Hollywood; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 91KA-0340; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 338-359.

Prior report: La.App., 595 So.2d 407.

Granted. Defendant’s sentence of 40 years at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence for first degree robbery, La.R.S. 14:64.1, is vacated and this case is remanded for re-sentencing. The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1, nor provide a factual basis for imposition of a maximum term of imprisonment for the defendant, a second felony offender whose prior conviction was in 1980. Upon resentencing, the district court should comply with La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1 as amended by Act 22 of 1991, which requires consideration of the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission in determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Richardson, 600 So. 2d 653, 1992 La. LEXIS 2392, 1992 WL 155600 (La. 1992).

600 So. 2d 653 (State v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.