State v. Richards

789 N.E.2d 237, 99 Ohio St. 3d 144
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 2003·No. Nos. 2003-0047 and 2003-0095·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the certified issue is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

{¶2} The discretionary appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Richards, 789 N.E.2d 237, 99 Ohio St. 3d 144 (Ohio 2003).

789 N.E.2d 237 (State v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fisher
789 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)