State v. Richards
This text of 1999 ND 20 (State v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/23/99 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1999 ND 21
Raymond Hovland, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Tom McCabe, Defendant and Appellee
No. 980320
Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable William W. McLees, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Corey J. Quinton (argued) and Paul R. Oppegard of Smith Bakke Hovland & Oppegard, P.O. Box 657, Moorhead, MN 56560-0657, plaintiff and appellant.
Mark R. Hays (argued) and James E. Nostdahl of Pringle & Herigstad, P.O. Box 1000, Minot, N.D. 58702-1000, for defendant and appellee.
Hovland v. McCabe
[¶1] Raymond Hovland appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Tom McCabe. On appeal, Hovland argues the district court erred in granting summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether Hovland has or will meet the tort thresholds contained in the North Dakota Auto Reparations Act, N.D.C.C. § 26.1-41-01(21).
[¶2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See Ellingson v. Knudson , 498 N.W.2d 814 (N.D. 1993).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 ND 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-richards-nd-1999.