State v. Richards

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Richards

973 A.2d 107, 292 Conn. 905, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 327

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 3, 2009·No. SC 18370·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 823 (AC 28567), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the police had a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car?”

Mary Beattie Schairer, special public defender, in support of the petition. Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 3, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 823 (AC 28567), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the police had a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car?”

Mary Beattie Schairer, special public defender, in support of the petition. Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 3, 2009

State v. Richards, 973 A.2d 107, 292 Conn. 905, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 327 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 107 (State v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related