State v. Richards

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Richards

973 A.2d 107, 292 Conn. 905, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 327

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 3, 2009

DocketSC 18370

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 973 A.2d 107 (State v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Richards, 973 A.2d 107, 292 Conn. 905, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 327 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 823 (AC 28567), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the police had a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car?”

Mary Beattie Schairer, special public defender, in support of the petition. Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 3, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 823 (AC 28567), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the police had a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car?”

Mary Beattie Schairer, special public defender, in support of the petition. Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 3, 2009

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

973 A.2d 107, 292 Conn. 905, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-richards-conn-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack