State v. Richard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Richard

234 S.W.3d 501, 2007 WL 2034251

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 17, 2007·No. No. ED 87860·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karl A. Richard appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 2000,¹ attempted first degree robbery in violation of section 564.011, and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. We find that the trial court did not err in limiting Richard’s counsel’s questions on voir dire. We also find that the trial court did not err in allowing the prosecutor to make certain comments during its closing argument.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karl A. Richard appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 2000,¹ attempted first degree robbery in violation of section 564.011, and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. We find that the trial court did not err in limiting Richard’s counsel’s questions on voir dire. We also find that the trial court did not err in allowing the prosecutor to make certain comments during its closing argument.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).

Footnotes

State v. Richard, 234 S.W.3d 501, 2007 WL 2034251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

234 S.W.3d 501 (State v. Richard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.