State v. Rich

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Rich

887 N.E.2d 346, 118 Ohio St. 3d 191

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2008·No. No. 2007-0456·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Spiert, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Spiert, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

State v. Rich, 887 N.E.2d 346, 118 Ohio St. 3d 191 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

887 N.E.2d 346 (State v. Rich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related