State v. Rich
Opinion
On December 31, 1991, the Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years for Forgery. Credit was given for 27 days time previously served.
On April 24,1992, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and represented himself. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Sentence Review Board wishes thank Mr. Rich for his assistance to this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
256 Mont. 4 (State v. Rich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.