State v. Rice

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Rice

811 P.2d 1392, 108 Or. App. 185, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1075

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 3, 1991

DocketC9003-31324; CA A65608

StatusPublished

This text of 811 P.2d 1392 (State v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rice, 811 P.2d 1392, 108 Or. App. 185, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1075 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction, after trial to the court, for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant executed a written waiver of his right to jury-trial, Or Const, Art I, § 11; State v. Valencia, 99 Or App 589, 783 P2d 51 (1989), so defendant’s conviction must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction, after trial to the court, for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant executed a written waiver of his right to jury-trial, Or Const, Art I, § 11; State v. Valencia, 99 Or App 589, 783 P2d 51 (1989), so defendant’s conviction must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

811 P.2d 1392, 108 Or. App. 185, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rice-orctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack