State v. Rice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rice

406 S.W.3d 120, 2013 WL 4419408, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 953

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 20, 2013·No. No. ED 98681·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rice (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of the Class D felony of attempted stealing, Section 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2012. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rice (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of the Class D felony of attempted stealing, Section 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2012. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Rice, 406 S.W.3d 120, 2013 WL 4419408, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 953 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

406 S.W.3d 120 (State v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.