State v. Rice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rice

367 S.W.3d 157, 2012 WL 1861514, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 690

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 2012·No. No. ED 95988·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcel Rice (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of trafficking in the second degree and two counts of possession of a controlled substance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission’s decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcel Rice (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of trafficking in the second degree and two counts of possession of a controlled substance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission’s decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Rice, 367 S.W.3d 157, 2012 WL 1861514, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 690 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 157 (State v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.