State v. Ricardo Johnson
This text of State v. Ricardo Johnson (State v. Ricardo Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
|
The State, |
Respondent, |
v.
|
Ricardo Johnson, |
Appellant. |
__________
Appeal From Orangeburg County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-152
Submitted February 1, 2010 Filed February 23, 2010
AFFIRMED
J. Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., all of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ricardo Johnson pled guilty to two counts of first-degree burglary, armed robbery, two counts of assault and battery with the intent to kill, and possession of a firearm. He appeals, arguing the trial judge erred in failing to recuse himself. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Lee, 350 S.C. 125, 130, 564 S.E.2d 372, 375 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for review).
AFFIRMED.
PIEPER, GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Ricardo Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ricardo-johnson-scctapp-2010.