State v. Rhonda Rombs

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 26, 2014
Docket13-14-00200-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Rhonda Rombs (State v. Rhonda Rombs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rhonda Rombs, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00200-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

RHONDA ROMBS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

Order of Abatement Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the State’s motion to abate and remand for

findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Court, having considered the motion, is of

the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, the Court hereby ABATES

the appeal and REMANDS the cause to the trial court for further proceedings as set forth

herein. On remand, the trial court is directed to express the essential findings of fact and

conclusions of law in support of its order granting the motion to suppress in this cause,

as requested by the State in its motion filed on April 14, 2014. See State v. Cullen, 195

S.W.3d 696, 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The trial court shall cause its findings and

conclusions to be included in either a supplemental clerk’s record or a supplemental

reporter’s record filed with the Court within thirty days of the date of this order. Should

the trial court require more time to comply with this order, it shall request an extension

prior to the expiration of this deadline.

Upon the filing of the supplemental record containing the trial court’s essential

findings and conclusions, the appeal will be reinstated.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 26th day of August, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Rhonda Rombs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rhonda-rombs-texapp-2014.