State v. Rhodes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rhodes

439 S.W.3d 296, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 916, 2014 WL 4198014

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. ED 100467·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Octavia R. Rhodes appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Warren County after a jury found her guilty of stealing a controlled substance. We find the trial court did not err in denying Rhodes’ motion for judgment of acquittal and imposing judgment and sentence.

No’ jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Octavia R. Rhodes appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Warren County after a jury found her guilty of stealing a controlled substance. We find the trial court did not err in denying Rhodes’ motion for judgment of acquittal and imposing judgment and sentence.

No’ jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Rhodes, 439 S.W.3d 296, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 916, 2014 WL 4198014 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

439 S.W.3d 296 (State v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.