State v. Reyes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Reyes

456 P.3d 385, 301 Or. App. 841

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 23, 2020

DocketA168052

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 P.3d 385 (State v. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reyes, 456 P.3d 385, 301 Or. App. 841 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted December 30, 2019; remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed January 23, 2020

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER REYES, Defendant-Appellant. Umatilla County Circuit Court 17CR04828; A168052 456 P3d 385

Daniel J. Hill, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Laura A. Frikert, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 842 State v. Reyes

PER CURIAM Defendant, who was convicted of assaulting a public safety officer, ORS 163.208, argues on appeal that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence of 42 months’ imprison- ment and 24 months’ post-prison supervision, which exceeds the statutory maximum of 60 months for that offense, ORS 161.605(3). The state concedes the error. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and, for the reasons set out in State v. Jepsen, 292 Or App 884, 885, 425 P3d 507 (2018), exer- cise our discretion to correct the error. We reject defendant’s remaining assignment of error without discussion. Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted December 30, 2019; remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed January 23, 2020

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER REYES, Defendant-Appellant. Umatilla County Circuit Court 17CR04828; A168052 456 P3d 385

Daniel J. Hill, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Laura A. Frikert, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 842 State v. Reyes

PER CURIAM Defendant, who was convicted of assaulting a public safety officer, ORS 163.208, argues on appeal that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence of 42 months’ imprison- ment and 24 months’ post-prison supervision, which exceeds the statutory maximum of 60 months for that offense, ORS 161.605(3). The state concedes the error. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and, for the reasons set out in State v. Jepsen, 292 Or App 884, 885, 425 P3d 507 (2018), exer- cise our discretion to correct the error. We reject defendant’s remaining assignment of error without discussion. Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 P.3d 385, 301 Or. App. 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reyes-orctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack