State v. Revels

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Revels

372 So. 2d 1175, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15195

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 1979

DocketNo. LL-422

StatusPublished

This text of 372 So. 2d 1175 (State v. Revels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Revels, 372 So. 2d 1175, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that an information charging Revels with a conspiracy to commit a felony, to wit: possession of more than 100 pounds of cannabis with intent to sell, Sections 777.04 and 893.13, Florida Statutes (1977), charged only a misdemean- or and that accordingly, Revels was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191, since he had not been brought to trial within 90 days of his arrest. It appears that the trial court did not have the benefit of our opinion in Aylin v. State, 362 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) at the time the orders were entered. On the authority of Aylin, supra, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent therewith.

McCORD, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that an information charging Revels with a conspiracy to commit a felony, to wit: possession of more than 100 pounds of cannabis with intent to sell, Sections 777.04 and 893.13, Florida Statutes (1977), charged only a misdemean- or and that accordingly, Revels was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191, since he had not been brought to trial within 90 days of his arrest. It appears that the trial court did not have the benefit of our opinion in Aylin v. State, 362 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) at the time the orders were entered. On the authority of Aylin, supra, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent therewith.

McCORD, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 So. 2d 1175, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-revels-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack