State v. Restiva

90 So. 23, 149 La. 683, 1921 La. LEXIS 1490
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 30, 1921·No. No. 24623·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PROVOSTY, J.

A demurrer was sustained below to the indictment reading that the accused “willfully and feloniously and with malaee aforethought did kill and murder,” etc. The defects consist in the omission of the word “his” before “malice” and in the use of the word “malaee” instead of “malice”; both fatal. Marr’s Crim. Juris, p. 55.

Judgment affirmed.

MONROE, C. J., concurs in decree for the reason that the word “malice” does not appear in the indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Restiva, 90 So. 23, 149 La. 683, 1921 La. LEXIS 1490 (La. 1921).

90 So. 23 (State v. Restiva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. LaFleur
249 So. 2d 101 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)
State v. Iseringhausen
16 So. 2d 65 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1943)
State v. Foster
114 So. 696 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)