State v. Renterio
This text of State v. Renterio (State v. Renterio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
No. 124,673
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
v.
MIGUEL S. RENTERIO, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appeal from Lyon District Court; MERLIN G. WHEELER, judge. Opinion filed July 22, 2022. Appeal dismissed.
Submitted by the parties for summary disposition under K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(g) and (h).
Before GREEN, P.J., SCHROEDER and CLINE, JJ.
PER CURIAM: Miguel S. Renterio appeals the district court's sentencing decision because it did not follow the recommendations in his plea agreement. We granted Renterio's motion for summary disposition under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 48). The State did not respond.
Under the revised Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, we lack jurisdiction to review Renterio's sentence because it was within the presumptive range for the crimes charged. K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(c)(1); State v. Albano, 313 Kan. 638, 640, 487 P.3d 750 (2021). Also, the district court was not bound by the sentencing recommendations made in the plea agreement. State v. Beck, 307 Kan. 108, 110, 406 P.3d 377 (2017).
1 Appeal dismissed under Supreme Court Rule 7.041A(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Renterio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-renterio-kanctapp-2022.