State v. Renterio

Court of Appeals of Kansas·Decided July 22, 2022·No. 124673·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No. 124,673

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

v.

MIGUEL S. RENTERIO, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Lyon District Court; MERLIN G. WHEELER, judge. Opinion filed July 22, 2022. Appeal dismissed.

Submitted by the parties for summary disposition under K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(g) and (h).

Before GREEN, P.J., SCHROEDER and CLINE, JJ.

PER CURIAM: Miguel S. Renterio appeals the district court's sentencing decision because it did not follow the recommendations in his plea agreement. We granted Renterio's motion for summary disposition under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 48). The State did not respond.

Under the revised Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, we lack jurisdiction to review Renterio's sentence because it was within the presumptive range for the crimes charged. K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(c)(1); State v. Albano, 313 Kan. 638, 640, 487 P.3d 750 (2021). Also, the district court was not bound by the sentencing recommendations made in the plea agreement. State v. Beck, 307 Kan. 108, 110, 406 P.3d 377 (2017).

1 Appeal dismissed under Supreme Court Rule 7.041A(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Renterio, (kanctapp 2022).

State v. Renterio (State v. Renterio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Albano
487 P.3d 750 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2021)