State v. Rennie
This text of 2021 ND 66 (State v. Rennie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 66
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Arnold Nudah Rennie, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200307
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Rennie No. 20200307
[¶1] Arnold Rennie appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor.
[¶2] On appeal, Rennie argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to dismiss based on alleged Rule 16, N.D.R.Crim.P., discovery violations by the State. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rennie’s motion to dismiss. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 66, 958 N.W.2d 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rennie-nd-2021.