State v. Renfrow
97 S.E.2d 218, 245 N.C. 665, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 635
This text of 97 S.E.2d 218 (State v. Renfrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Renfrow, 97 S.E.2d 218, 245 N.C. 665, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 635 (N.C. 1957).
Opinion
The evidence was abundantly sufficient to go to the jury and to sustain the verdict and judgment. The exceptions to the admissibility of evidence are without merit. The charge was free from error. No reason appears why the judgment should be disturbed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Ward
128 S.E.2d 673 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 S.E.2d 218, 245 N.C. 665, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-renfrow-nc-1957.