State v. Renfrow

97 S.E.2d 218, 245 N.C. 665, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 635
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 20, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The evidence was abundantly sufficient to go to the jury and to sustain the verdict and judgment. The exceptions to the admissibility of evidence are without merit. The charge was free from error. No reason appears why the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Renfrow, 97 S.E.2d 218, 245 N.C. 665, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 635 (N.C. 1957).

97 S.E.2d 218 (State v. Renfrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ward
128 S.E.2d 673 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)