State v. Rendleman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rendleman

477 S.W.3d 696, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2015 WL 8230362

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 8, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101760

StatusPublished

This text of 477 S.W.3d 696 (State v. Rendleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rendleman, 477 S.W.3d 696, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2015 WL 8230362 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Rendleman appeals from the sentence and judgment entered following a jury trial convicting him of one count of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo (2000),¹ one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, and one count of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 565.060. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the sentence and judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Choi PRO. 30.25(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Rendleman appeals from the sentence and judgment entered following a jury trial convicting him of one count of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo (2000),¹ one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, and one count of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 565.060. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the sentence and judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Choi PRO. 30.25(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 S.W.3d 696, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2015 WL 8230362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rendleman-moctapp-2015.