State v. Reliford
568 So. 2d 534, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106, 1990 WL 159679
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1990·No. No. 90-474·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The trial court failed to give written reasons for a downward departure of sentence after an admission of violation of previously imposed community control. Following the dictates of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990), we reverse with directions to give the defendant in the trial court the opportunity to either withdraw an admission of violation of community control, or be sentenced within the guidelines with no possibility of departure.1
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Reliford, 568 So. 2d 534, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106, 1990 WL 159679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
568 So. 2d 534 (State v. Reliford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Magrans v. State
584 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Johnson
591 So. 2d 204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. McCall
573 So. 2d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)