State v. Reliford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Reliford

568 So. 2d 534, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106, 1990 WL 159679

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 23, 1990

DocketNo. 90-474

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 568 So. 2d 534 (State v. Reliford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reliford, 568 So. 2d 534, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106, 1990 WL 159679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to give written reasons for a downward departure of sentence after an admission of violation of previously imposed community control. Following the dictates of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990), we reverse with directions to give the defendant in the trial court the opportunity to either withdraw an admission of violation of community control, or be sentenced within the guidelines with no possibility of departure.¹

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to give written reasons for a downward departure of sentence after an admission of violation of previously imposed community control. Following the dictates of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990), we reverse with directions to give the defendant in the trial court the opportunity to either withdraw an admission of violation of community control, or be sentenced within the guidelines with no possibility of departure.¹

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 So. 2d 534, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106, 1990 WL 159679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reliford-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack