State v. Reliable Refuse, Inc.
This text of 549 A.2d 681 (State v. Reliable Refuse, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The named defendant is appealing from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff on the defendants’ counterclaim following a directed verdict.
The defendants did not move to set aside the directed verdict, thereby limiting this court to a plain error standard of review. Practice Book § 4185; Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 515, 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, 3 Conn. App. 181, 183, 485 A.2d 1360, cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802, 491 A.2d 1105 (1985); Eagar v. Barron, 2 Conn. App. 468, 472, 480 A.2d 567 (1984).
An examination of the record fails to disclose plain error.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 A.2d 681, 17 Conn. App. 801, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reliable-refuse-inc-connappct-1988.