State v. Reliable Refuse, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Reliable Refuse, Inc.

549 A.2d 681, 17 Conn. App. 801, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 437

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided October 26, 1988·No. 6366·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The named defendant is appealing from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff on the defendants’ counterclaim following a directed verdict.

The defendants did not move to set aside the directed verdict, thereby limiting this court to a plain error standard of review. Practice Book § 4185; Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 515, 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, 3 Conn. App. 181, 183, 485 A.2d 1360, cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802, 491 A.2d 1105 (1985); Eagar v. Barron, 2 Conn. App. 468, 472, 480 A.2d 567 (1984).

An examination of the record fails to disclose plain error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The named defendant is appealing from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff on the defendants’ counterclaim following a directed verdict.

The defendants did not move to set aside the directed verdict, thereby limiting this court to a plain error standard of review. Practice Book § 4185; Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 515, 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, 3 Conn. App. 181, 183, 485 A.2d 1360, cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802, 491 A.2d 1105 (1985); Eagar v. Barron, 2 Conn. App. 468, 472, 480 A.2d 567 (1984).

An examination of the record fails to disclose plain error.

There is no error.

State v. Reliable Refuse, Inc., 549 A.2d 681, 17 Conn. App. 801, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 437 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

549 A.2d 681 (State v. Reliable Refuse, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related