State v. Reinke
This text of 298 N.W.2d 816 (State v. Reinke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an amended order suspending imposition of sentence. We affirm.
Appellant pleaded guilty to third-degree burglary. The trial court accepted a plea bargain agreement and suspended imposition of sentence. In addition to placing appellant on probation for four years, the trial court imposed a $500 fine.
Appellant argues that in the absence of specific statutory authority, an order suspending imposition of sentence cannot require the payment of a fine as a condition of probation. See State v. Marshall, 247 N.W.2d 484 (S.D.1976), SDCL 23A-27-13. We do not reach this issue.
Appellant concedes that he knowingly accepted the payment of the fine as a condition of probation. He made no objection to the trial court. Consequently, he may not raise his objection to the condition of probation for the first time on appeal. State v. Iverson, 269 N.W.2d 390 (S.D.1978). See State v. Jackson, 272 N.W.2d 102 (S.D.1978).
The amended order suspending the imposition of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 N.W.2d 816, 1980 S.D. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reinke-sd-1980.